Classroom on the Quad

Hearing in Equanimity: Deciding Your Path

By Bobbi Patterson, Senior Lecturer in Religion


Return to AE Contents

Classroom on the Quad
Welcome and Introductions
Bruce Knauft, Faculty Council

Jim Grimsley, Faculty Council

Purvi Patel, College Council

Donna Wong, Campus Life

Iraq: The Challenge of Responsibility
Rick Doner, Political Science

Weapons of Mass Destruction and U.S. Foreign Policy
Dan Reiter, Political Science

A Call to Words
Asanka Pathiraja, Foreign Policy Exchange

Hearing in Eqanimity: Deciding Your Path
Bobbi Patterson, Religion

The Necessity of War with Iraq
Bob Bartlett, Political Science

The Humanitarian Cost of War
Laurie Patton, Religion

A Man of Honor: The President's Noble Vision
Daniel Hauck, College Republicans

Women: War and Peace
Lili Baxter, Women's Studies

The Morality of War
James Tarter, Students for War Against Terrorism

Speak Up or Get Out
Erin Harte, Young Democrats

War Does Not Resolve Conflict, War Is Conflict
Mark Goodale, Anthropology

A War of Liberation
Frank Lechner, Sociology

A Call to Consciousness, A Litany of Questions
Juana Clem McGhee, Institute for Comparative and International Studies

Student Activism: Ways to Be Involved
Erik Fyfe and Rachael Spiewak, Emory Peace Coalition

Cross-Cultural Communication: U.S. and Iraq
Devin Stewart, Middle Eastern and South Asian Studies

The U.S. Has Never Been Alone in the World
William Chace, University President

 

Gratitude to the ones who shaped this time together.

There are streams of thought and practice relevant to our current situation in Christianity and Buddhism (which I study), and I feel confident in all religious traditions, as well.

Those streams offer paths for learning and living in equanimity and balance, even in the midst of war. This is required surely for those in the fighting but also for us who, certainly once the fighting is over, must discern our next steps in a world struggling and suffering. Their approach is to weave reflective, contemplative meditation or prayer and what we are doing now with active, purposeful engagement.

Using their ideas, I want to speak to three topics:

1-inadequacy (perhaps involving shame and guilt)
2- intention or discernment
3- motivated hope in action

Inadequacy
Facing and living with war: from whatever personal, political, philosophical, or religious perspectives, an experience of inadequacy is normal and even appropriate. The reality of an overwhelming magnitude of clashing forces—national, international, rational, irrational, on the battlefield—in our hearts and minds stirs inadequacy.

Thomas Merton the American monk wrote that [inadequacy is] “the root of war, fear, waves of fear and its neighbor rage. Fear of other, self, mixture of the two, fear feeds inadequacy sometimes as a false bravado." Some of us facing our inadequacies become hooked on them as shame. An embarrassed sense of missing of the mark of our fundamental values and beliefs. We also experience them as guilt, with a knowledge that we have not done what we ought.

People tell me this: "We have not been as involved as we should, in whatever way for whatever position we have not met our responsibilities—we now sense that there are costs because of this."

The reflective traditions within Christianity and Buddhism that shape action suggest that we note our inadequacies—seriously, but not dwell not them, certainly not browbeat or punish or upbraid ourselves. The world we are in is suffering enough. We lose energy needed for healing. This response of self-blame, guilt sourced by anxiety and inadequacy.

What is useful is our next step: intention for discerning.

Intention
I ntention involves a commitment: theoretically life-long but pragmatically daily. Intention is the practice of sharpening the heart and mind to pay attention—deep attention—to what is right now, to self and others. The dynamics of living one focuses intentionally to discern compassion, justice, in Christianity for Holy love—its presence or absence—through the regular exercise and training of focus and self awareness.

Intention also invites an openness to hearing and understanding what’s going on beyond you and to practice this consciousness of radically presence attending love and justice.

This is done quietly, reflectively, prayerfully. Intention is practiced/trained, mindful compassion and justice. It shapes
discernment to choose action, motivated by hope.

Motivated hope
Choose to act at whatever level, but let hope shape your next steps as the war proceeds, and surely after it we will all either take or be moved along by someone’s next steps.

Discern your own path using this motivation of hope as your criteria
Nothing but motivated hope can sustain the work with others that never gives up, never loses the heart-eye of compassion and justice for the common good.

Motivated hope can create inter-religious, international, local, and intercultural civic and spiritual groups ready to work together for needed change.

So let the inadequacy of guilt go.

Spend time in intentional reflection, contemplate, know yourself very well.

Be open, often giving amid great pain.

Discern and choose next steps motivated by hope in compassion and justice, reflect, and work to this world.

All of us, say the traditions, need to dissolve fear.