Emory Report | December 13, 1999 |
Volume 52, No. 15 |
Blumenthal's book looks at battle between good and evil David Blumenthal doesn't just talk about the problem of evil; his research and teaching about the topic have yielded a wealth of information and a new book, The Banality of Good and Evil, that draws some surprising parallels between humanity's two most compelling impulses. His central thesis: you can teach people to do good. Blumenthal, the Cohen Professor of Judaic Studies, says his research is both inspired and informed by his course, "The Problem of Evil," which he has been teaching for about six years. Dubbed "Advanced Evil" or "the evil course" by students, the class looks at the question: How do people actually reach moral judgments? Both in the class and his book, Blumenthal examines evidence from the social sciences and contemporary history to show how the nature of social conformity (obedience) and the phenomenon of moral resistance (disobedience) help answer the question of what makes people do evil and good. Perhaps nowhere is the stark contrast between good and evil actions so readily exemplified as during the shoah (Hebrew for "holocaust") of World War II, one of the most traumatic events of the 20th century. Blumenthal's research begins by highlighting a troubling yet intriguing parallel: both perpetrators of atrocities and heroic rescuers of Jews have explained that they did only what was expected. To them, their actions were commonplace, banal. How can antisocial, hurtful and evil acts be considered commonplace by some, while prosocial, heroic acts seem routine to others? Blumenthal admits that constructing a field theory to explain this parallel is fraught with problems. "Perhaps I have entered a realm where even angels fear to tread," he wrote in the book's opening chapter. Yet he points out that "our responsibility to prevent social violence obligates us to search for the motives and environments that will encourage good and discourage evil." Blumenthal observes six dimensions shared by the phenomena that facilitate good and evil: human character; personal psychological history (particularly how discipline, empowerment and self-esteem are handled in childhood); socialization (including everything from modeling to formal instruction); the effects of authority and hierarchy; roles, norms and rules; and actions or practice. Using these common elements as a springboard, Blumenthal draws together historical, social-psychological and personal data to note four similar factors that, depending on how they are used, can lead people to do evil, or to do good. These include:
Perhaps, Blumenthal supposed, there's not enough emphasis on "how." How does society cultivate prosocial, "good" attitudes and actions? In the chapter titled "Do this," Blumenthal gives several strong recommendations to teachers:
-Elaine Justice Return to December 13, 1999 contents page
|