next up previous
Next: About this document

Conceptual Questions (5 points each)


Questions 1 -- 3 refer to the following situation.

tex2html_wrap441 tex2html_wrap443


  1. Which depiction below is a valid representation of the electric field lines of the two charges?

    tex2html_wrap445 tex2html_wrap447

  2. At which of the marked points can the electric field equal zero?

    B.

    The two contributions to the electric field, due to the -q and -4q charges, must cancel; that is, they must be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Both charges have an attractive field; thus to the left of the -q charge, both point to the right; to the right of the -4q charge, both point to the left. Only in between are the two electric field contributions in opposite directions, with the electric field due to the -q charge pointing left, and that due to the -4q charge pointing right. To set the magnitudes of the two contributions equal in this region, we note that the electric field due to Q is proportional to tex2html_wrap_inline249 , where r is the distance from Q to where we are calculating the electric field. Thus to balance the electric field due to -q a distance d to the right of -q, we must be a distance 2d to the left of the -4q charge, to get the same magnitude tex2html_wrap_inline249 . This means we must be closer to the weaker charge -q.

  3. At point E, two uncharged conducting spheres, L and R, are suspended from insulating threads so that they touch each other, as shown. When the two spheres are separated, how will they be charged?

    tex2html_wrap449

    tabular44

    While in contact, charge moves between the conducting spheres,with negative charges migrating to R due to the repulsive -4q charge, leaving an opposite positive charge on L. When L and R are separated, this charge separation persists, leaving L positive and R negative.

    Questions 4 -- 9 refer to the following situation:


    tex2html_wrap451 tex2html_wrap453

  4. What electric force is exerted on a -4 tex2html_wrap_inline275 test charge placed just inside the top plate?

    (a) 0.6 N, upward

    tex2html_wrap_inline277 , so that the electric force has magnitude tex2html_wrap_inline279 . Because the test charge is negative, tex2html_wrap_inline281 points opposite tex2html_wrap_inline283 ; that is, upward.

  5. What is the charge on the top plate of the capacitor?

    (c) tex2html_wrap_inline285 C

    A capacitor has plates with charge +Q and -Q, where tex2html_wrap_inline291 , which here equals tex2html_wrap_inline293 C. To figure out the sign of charge on the top plate specifically, note that the electric field lines start on the top plate, meaning that it must have positive charge.

  6. Which of the following is a valid plot of the equipotential curves between the capacitor plates?

    tex2html_wrap455 tex2html_wrap457

  7. How much work is required to move a -4 tex2html_wrap_inline275 test charge horizontally from A to B, a distance of 2 mm?

    (e) zero

    Horizontal motion is along a single equipotential, perpendicular to the electric force; hence no work is done by the electric field. This is true (work done is zero) whenever the net change in potential of the motion is zero.

  8. How much work is done by the electric field in moving a -4 tex2html_wrap_inline275 test charge from the top to the bottom plate of the capacitor?

    (b) tex2html_wrap_inline299 J

    Work done by the electric field is tex2html_wrap_inline301 . Here we have a decrease in potential from top to bottom of 3000 V, giving tex2html_wrap_inline303 J. Note that negative work makes sense, as the electron moves opposite the direction that it is pushed by the electric field.

  9. Suppose that a dielectric sheet is inserted to completely fill the space between the plates, and the potential difference between the plates drops to 1000 V. What is the capacitance of the system after the dielectric is inserted?

    (e) tex2html_wrap_inline305 F

    Inserting a dielectric increases the capacitance, with the new C given by tex2html_wrap_inline309 . For fixed charge on the plates (since our capacitor is isolated), this reduces the voltage across the plates to tex2html_wrap_inline311 , since tex2html_wrap_inline291 always. Here tex2html_wrap_inline315 is reduced by a factor of 3, so tex2html_wrap_inline317 , and the new capacitance must be 3 times the old.

    Questions 10 -- 12 refer to the following circuit:


    tex2html_wrap459

  10. tex2html_wrap_inline319 is measured to be 1.5 A. Which of the following gives the currents through the 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 and 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistors?

    (b) tex2html_wrap_inline325

    tex2html_wrap_inline319 divides at the junction with the parallel 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 and 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistors, with its two branches, tex2html_wrap_inline333 and tex2html_wrap_inline335 , summing to the original current tex2html_wrap_inline319 . Since the voltage drops across the parallel resistors are equal, each resistor draws a current tex2html_wrap_inline339 which is inversely proportional to its resistance. Thus the 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistor, with twice the resistance, draws half as much current as the 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistor. (b) is the only choice satisfying both the correct proportionality and the correct sum.

  11. Which of the following statements is correct, concerning the voltage drops tex2html_wrap_inline345 , tex2html_wrap_inline347 , and tex2html_wrap_inline349 across the 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 , 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 and 30 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistors, respectively?

    (c) tex2html_wrap_inline349 is greater than tex2html_wrap_inline347 which equals tex2html_wrap_inline345 .

    tex2html_wrap_inline347 and tex2html_wrap_inline345 are equal, because the 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 and 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistors are in parallel. Note that the current through the 30 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistor is greater than that of either parallel resistor (this because tex2html_wrap_inline373 ; the 30 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistor sees the full current through both parallel resistors) Since it has the greatest current and the greatest resistance, the 30 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistor has the greates voltage drop tex2html_wrap_inline379 .

  12. What is the equivalent resistance of the 10 tex2html_wrap_inline321 and 20 tex2html_wrap_inline321 resistors?

    (c) 6.7 tex2html_wrap_inline321

    Since they are in parallel,

    displaymath387

Quantitative Problems (Point Value as Marked)


  1. (24 points)
    Two charges of magnitude Q= 2.0 C are held 2.0 m apart as shown in the figure.

    tex2html_wrap461

    1. What is the electric potential energy of the two charges; that is, what work is required to bring them from infinite separation to their current positions?
    2. What is the electric potential due to the charges at the point P shown?
    3. In what direction does the electric field point at P? SHOW the vector sum of electric fields due to both charges and state why they sum to this direction.



    tex2html_wrap463

    tex2html_wrap465

    tex2html_wrap467

    1. We calculate the work required to assemble the charges. In bringing in the first charge tex2html_wrap_inline397 , no work is done, because no electric field acts on the charge. In bringing in the second charge tex2html_wrap_inline399 , however, we must do work, as we must overcome a repulsive electric force due to the first charge. That work is

      displaymath401

      since the electric potential energy of tex2html_wrap_inline399 is zero when infinitely far from tex2html_wrap_inline397 . This work required is thus

      displaymath407

      The electric potential energy of the charges, which is just the work required to assemble them, is thus tex2html_wrap_inline409

    2. The electric potential at P is just the sum of the electric potential at P due to each charge. Individually, this is just V= kq/r, where q is the charge and r is the distance from the charge to P. Thus

      displaymath417

    3. Both charges exert a repulsive electric field, directed away from themselves as shown. Both electric fields have equal magnitude tex2html_wrap_inline419 at P, and both make the same angle tex2html_wrap_inline421 with the x-axis. Thus both have equal and opposite vertical components, and their vector sum points to the right.

      tex2html_wrap469

  2. (16 points)
    Consider the following circuit. tex2html_wrap471 tex2html_wrap473



    tex2html_wrap475

    tex2html_wrap477

    tex2html_wrap479

    tex2html_wrap481

    tex2html_wrap483

    Potential drops across each resistor are labeled; the currents shown flow from higher (+) to lower (-) potential. I have labeled my loops as shown. Choosing opposite directions for a loop will just multiply the entire loop equation by a sign. Kirchhoff's loop laws give, for each loop

    eqnarray171

    Two loop equations suffice to find tex2html_wrap_inline437 and tex2html_wrap_inline439 . Here I use loop 1 and loop 3, which yield

    eqnarray180




next up previous
Next: About this document

Katherine Benson
Tue Feb 9 23:44:47 EST 1999