next up previous
Next: About this document

  1. See worked Griffiths example 3.8.
  2. See worked Griffiths example 3.9.
  3. (Ben) We write tex2html_wrap_inline82 as the sum tex2html_wrap_inline84 (noting that only terms with tex2html_wrap_inline86 are required to represent a second order polynomial.) We find the coefficients tex2html_wrap_inline88 by
    1. eyeballing: the tex2html_wrap_inline90 term comes only from tex2html_wrap_inline92 . Since tex2html_wrap_inline90 has coefficient 3, tex2html_wrap_inline96 must be 2. So now we have

      displaymath100

      But tex2html_wrap_inline102 , so we have exactly tex2html_wrap_inline104 , giving

      displaymath106

    2. The orthogonality relations 3.68 tell us that if

      displaymath108

      then

      displaymath110

      Since tex2html_wrap_inline82 is of degree 2, tex2html_wrap_inline114 vanishes for l;SPMgt;2, from

      displaymath118

      We thus must find tex2html_wrap_inline120 and tex2html_wrap_inline96 by integration. They are

      eqnarray23

      Here we have used the fact that in evaluating

      displaymath124

      even terms in f(x) cancel between the endpoints, while odd terms are twice the contribution from x=1.

  4. See Boas section 13.5.





Katherine Benson
Tue Apr 16 15:52:24 EDT 2002