next up previous
Next: About this document

  1. We wish to solve tex2html_wrap_inline161 with initial conditions tex2html_wrap_inline163 .

    First we seek a particular solution for our driving force. Substituting the form tex2html_wrap_inline165 , we find the differential equation is true if

    displaymath167

    Thus we have the particular solution

    displaymath169

    To get the most general solution possible we must add the general solution to the homogeneous problem, giving

    tex2html_wrap_inline171 with velocity

    displaymath173

    Imposing the boundary conditions at t=0 then gives

    eqnarray34

    which yields, after algebra,

    tex2html_wrap_inline177

  2. We now seek the solution for a sawtooth driving force,

    displaymath179

    For a specific n, defining tex2html_wrap_inline183 , we obtain the particular solution with form given by section 1.9:

    displaymath185

    where

    displaymath187

    The full solution for the sawtooth driving force is then given by superposition,

    displaymath189

    1. The LC circuit obeys (from Kirchoff's laws, setting the net voltage change for the full circuit loop to zero)

      displaymath191

      This is just an undamped oscillator equation, with solution

      displaymath193

      for tex2html_wrap_inline195 . (Our usual solution method tex2html_wrap_inline197 yields tex2html_wrap_inline199 , or tex2html_wrap_inline201 , to give the tex2html_wrap_inline203 oscillating solutions we've chosen to write as sin and cos here.)

    2. We have

      eqnarray70

      giving initial conditions

      displaymath205

      Here initial conditions are tex2html_wrap_inline207 , giving tex2html_wrap_inline209 , so our solution is

      displaymath211

    3. With a constant voltage source in the circuit, Kirchoff's law for voltage drops across the current loop gives

      displaymath213

      (Note that, traversing the circuit clockwise from the switch, we have a voltage gain tex2html_wrap_inline215 followed by voltage drops tex2html_wrap_inline217 and q/C; the total gain must balance the total drop.) The particular solution is just a constant tex2html_wrap_inline221 , obeying

      displaymath223

    4. The full solution is the sum of the particular solution (c) and the homogeneous general solution (a), with coefficients fixed by initial conditions. Thus

      eqnarray84

      giving initial conditions

      displaymath225

      Here initial conditions are tex2html_wrap_inline227 , giving tex2html_wrap_inline229 , so our solution is

      displaymath231

    5. Here the homogeneous solution, tex2html_wrap_inline233 , does not decay in time. It persists and remains comparable to the particular solution tex2html_wrap_inline235 forever. Thus the homogeneous solution is not transient, nor does the system ever reach a steady state described only by the particular solution.

  3. For the RC circuit with voltage source tex2html_wrap_inline237 , Kirchoff's law for voltage drops along the circuit loop gives

    displaymath239

    (As in problem 3, in traversing the circuit clockwise from the switch, we have a voltage gain tex2html_wrap_inline237 followed by voltage drops tex2html_wrap_inline243 and q/C, with the total gain balancing the total drop.)

    We seek a particular solution to the inhomogeneous ODE

    displaymath247

    As in section 1.9, it is simpler to look at the complex ODE

    displaymath249

    whose real part reproduces our original ODE. When we obtain our final answer q to this complex ODE, its real part will solve our original equation.

    We write our trial solution as proportional to the source,

    displaymath253

    where tex2html_wrap_inline255 is time-independent. Plugging this form into our ODE gives

    displaymath257

    or

    displaymath259

    Writing tex2html_wrap_inline255 as tex2html_wrap_inline263 , in order to separate out phase and amplitude information on the response, gives

    displaymath265

    Thus

    displaymath267

    giving particular solution

    displaymath269

    with tex2html_wrap_inline271 as given above. Taking the real part to find the solution to our original real ODE,

    displaymath273

    again with tex2html_wrap_inline271 as given above.

    Note that the amplitude to our response is maximal when the denominator in its prefactor above is minimal (that is, when tex2html_wrap_inline277 is minimal). This clearly occurs when tex2html_wrap_inline279 . The magnification factor, relating the intensity of the response at tex2html_wrap_inline281 to its maximal value at tex2html_wrap_inline279 is given by

    displaymath285

    The phase lag tex2html_wrap_inline271 has tangent ranging from 0 at tex2html_wrap_inline279 , through positive values to tex2html_wrap_inline291 as tex2html_wrap_inline293 ; thus it ranges from 0 at tex2html_wrap_inline279 to tex2html_wrap_inline297 as tex2html_wrap_inline293 . Both the magnification factor and phase lag are plotted below.

    tex2html_wrap301




next up previous
Next: About this document

Katherine Benson
Mon Feb 11 22:24:17 EST 2002