next up previous
Next: About this document

Having pinned down the meaning of the right hand side of Newton II (acceleration), we returned to the full problem of solving Newton II in 3 space dimensions. We noted that for forces which are constant or dependent only on time, the vector equation just gives 3 differential equations, tex2html_wrap_inline15 , where i labels the component along the i-th basis vector. Note that these equations can be coupled, as the component of acceleration in the i-th direction is not always merely the second time derivative of tex2html_wrap_inline23 (the position component in the i-th direction), as we showed for polar coordinates.

We then generalized the work-energy theorem to three dimensions, obtaining for the power the dot product between the force applied and the velocity of the particle. For the work, we obtained a path integral of the force applied along the direction of the particle's motion. We talked about extending our 1-dimensional concept of potential energy to 3 dimensions, by defining potential energy at tex2html_wrap_inline27 as the work done to bring the particle from a standard location tex2html_wrap_inline29 to tex2html_wrap_inline31 . Note, however, that our definition of the work performed involves the path followed by the particle as we move it between the two endpoints. We might reasonably expect the result obtained to depend on which path we chose in bringing the particle from tex2html_wrap_inline33 to tex2html_wrap_inline35 . To define a meaningful potential, which depends only on tex2html_wrap_inline37 and not on a complete history of the particle's motion, we insist that our answer not depend on the path taken. We showed that this condition (path independence of the line integral for the potential) was equivalent to requiring that the line integral for work done around any closed loop vanish.

To get some practice and to derive Stokes' theorem for path integrals, we began to calculate explicitly the work performed by a force field tex2html_wrap_inline39 (in Cartesian coordinates) on a particle that follows the following rectangular path in the xy-plane: tex2html_wrap_inline43 . By working carefully, always taking the component of force along the integration variable which locally describes the path, we were able to relate the path integral to a sum of ordinary integrals, one for each leg of the rectangular path. We will relate our sum to area integrals next time.

-- KB




next up previous
Next: About this document

Katherine Benson
Mon Sep 30 09:04:49 EDT 1996