next up previous
Next: About this document

We continued the derivation from last time, transforming Newton's Laws into a new coordinate basis, tex2html_wrap_inline41 . We focused on the acceleration side of the transformed equation, using a roundabout trick to express the acceleration side in terms of partial derivatives of the kinetic energy T:

displaymath45

Here T is the coordinate-transformed kinetic energy, which depends generally both on the new coordinates tex2html_wrap_inline49 and their time-derivatives tex2html_wrap_inline51 . The partial derivatives were taken ignoring the relationship between a coordinate tex2html_wrap_inline53 and its time-derivative tex2html_wrap_inline55 ; that is, varying one while holding the other fixed (along with all the other tex2html_wrap_inline57 and tex2html_wrap_inline59 for tex2html_wrap_inline61 , which are held fixed in taking a tex2html_wrap_inline63 or tex2html_wrap_inline65 partial derivative).

Recombining this result with the generalized force side of our transformed Newton II gives, for the tranformed Newton II,

displaymath67

By defining the Lagrangian L = T- V, we rewrite this as

displaymath71

the Euler-Lagrange equations.

Using the Euler-Langrange equations -- that is, the Lagrangian approach -- is easier than using Newton II directly because you only need to know positions and velocities as a function of your generalized coordinates tex2html_wrap_inline73 . You simply calculate T, calculate V, and plug L = T - V into the Euler-Lagrange equations. These automatically generate the right expressions for the acceleration components needed to use Newton II.

-- KB





Katherine Benson
Fri Oct 18 10:14:09 EDT 1996