next up previous
Next: About this document

Today we finished our discussion of symmetries and conservation laws, and introduced the Hamiltonian.

We continued studying specific examples of the use of Noether's theorem. We first reviewed how the conserved quantity associated with spatial translation is linear momentum. We then considered a system with rotational invariance (for example, the motion of a particle under the gravitational influence of a very massive body at the origin). We reviewed why an infinitesimal rotation by the angle tex2html_wrap_inline23 about the rotation axis tex2html_wrap_inline25 leads to tex2html_wrap_inline27 . We noted why the Lagrangian is unchanged by this transformation, to first order in tex2html_wrap_inline29 . We then plugged tex2html_wrap_inline31 , F, and tex2html_wrap_inline35 into Noether's theorem to find that the associated conserved quantity for rotation about the axis tex2html_wrap_inline37 is the tex2html_wrap_inline39 -component of angular momentum.

Finally, we considered the example of time translation. Expressed as a coordinate transformation, time translation causes tex2html_wrap_inline41 . We found the Lagrangian changes by a total derivative, tex2html_wrap_inline43 , only when it has no explicit time-dependence. We constructed the conserved charge and found it coincided with the Jacobi integral discussed earlier, which is constant whenever L has no explicit time-dependence. We thus see why the Jacobi integral is conserved.

Time translation invariance plays a fundamental role in physics: it asserts our belief that the laws of physics governing our world today are the same as those in the past and those in the future. If we had no confidence about this, we would have little motivation to study physical laws whose nature might capriciously change at any time.

The conserved quantity related to time translation invariance thus has deep significance, so much so that it has received its own name: the Hamiltonian H. Physically, it corresponds to the energy, as we showed in class for T with quadratic and linear terms in the coordinate velocities. This is a very physical object, which you have cultivated a strong physical intuition about. It is quite natural to think of the Hamiltonian H, instead of the Lagrangian L, as the primary quantity governing a system's motion, and to phrase physical laws in terms of H. We will do this shortly.

At this point, we wrapped up the discussion of symmetries and conservation laws. We foreshadowed the power of Noether's theorem in field theory, which deals not with particles at positions tex2html_wrap_inline57 , but with fields (like the electric and magnetic fields) that vary over space and time: tex2html_wrap_inline59 . The motion of these fields is also governed by an action principle, where the action is an integral over spacetime of a Lagrange density, varying over space, which depends on tex2html_wrap_inline61 , tex2html_wrap_inline63 , and tex2html_wrap_inline65 . Under symmetries, the fields transform such that the Lagrange density changes only by derivative terms, tex2html_wrap_inline67 , where tex2html_wrap_inline69 ranges over all four spacetime components. Noether's theorem then gives us a conserved current, tex2html_wrap_inline71 , whose conservation law tex2html_wrap_inline73 , means, when written out explicitly, tex2html_wrap_inline75 . That is, we get a local charge conservation law, relating changes in charge density within a region to inflows and outflows of current from that region. In this way we get another kind of conservation law -- conservation of electric charge -- as a consequence of symmetries and Noether's theorem.

--

KB




next up previous
Next: About this document

Katherine Benson
Mon Nov 11 15:33:40 EST 1996