next up previous
Next: About this document

Continued discussing the damped harmonic oscillator, then introduced a driving force, making the differential equation inhomogeneous.

First, considered the overdamped oscillator in the limit when tex2html_wrap_inline16 . We Taylor expanded the general solution about tex2html_wrap_inline18 , keeping the first two independent solutions (since we continue to solve a second order equation, with two independent solutions). The other terms must vanish in the tex2html_wrap_inline20 limit. We found two independent pieces survived the limit: the two solutions tex2html_wrap_inline22 and tex2html_wrap_inline24 claimed for the critically damped ( tex2html_wrap_inline26 ) case. Again we return to equilibrium without oscillation.

We then considered the late time behavior in each physical case:

1. Underdamped. Remains sinusoidal, with exponentially declining amplitude tex2html_wrap_inline28 .

2. Overdamped. Dominated by the tex2html_wrap_inline30 solution (unless initial conditions set a to zero). This amplitude decays more slowly than both the underdamped case and the critically damped case below.

2. Critically damped. Dominated by tex2html_wrap_inline34 solution, with rate of change shown to be dominated by term tex2html_wrap_inline36 . This decays, at late times, much faster than either 1) or 2) above. Generally, a critically damped spring will return the fastest, when displaced from equilibrium.

We then considered adding a driving force to the above system. For simplicity, we first took the force to be tex2html_wrap_inline38 .

We searched for a particular solution of form tex2html_wrap_inline40 , and found one algebraically, by substitution into the differential equation. This had the form tex2html_wrap_inline42 , where the expressions we obtained for a and tex2html_wrap_inline46 were quite complicated. Thus the particular solution to this problem was tex2html_wrap_inline48 .

-- KB





Katherine Benson
Fri Sep 20 14:39:21 EDT 1996