up previous


Writing Assignment 2

Due Tuesday, March 2, 4 pm

Reading:

Conceptual:

Attached passages from Brian Greene, The Elegant Universe (Norton and Company, New York, 1999), pp 60 -- 65.
Technical:

Taylor & Wheeler 5.8 -- 5.10 (time dilation and Lorentz contraction) Berry section 4.3 (differential geometry, nonEuclidean surfaces)

Writing

The writing assignment deals particularly with paragraphs 2 through 7 of Greene's passage.

Summary
For each of paragraphs 2 through 8, write a sentence or two summarizing the material presented in the paragraph. For example, a summary of paragraph 1 might be ``Here Greene recalls that constant velocity motion of a reference frame is undetectable: any experiment within the reference frame obeys the same internally consistent physical laws, with no observable consequence of a boost velocity. He then introduces the equivalence principle, here stated as the indistinguishability of forces due to gravity and those due to accelerated reference frames, leading to the indistinguishability of gravity and accelerated motion.''

Analysis
You need use full sentences only when specifically requested.
  1. Relative to unaccelerated space, show the instantaneous Lorentz boost of a rider on the Tornado at radius $r$. Take your xy-axes to point in the instantaneous tangential and radial directions.
  2. Using your Lorentz boost matrix from 1, what circumference and radius do Slim and Jim measure for a Tornado of radius $r$. In sentence(s), why is this result consistent with Greene's paragraphs 4 and 5?
  3. What value for the curvature $K$, then, do Slim and Jim measure at Tornado radius $r$? Is this curvature positive or negative?
  4. Has this curvature been measured in a single locally inertial frame (LIF) or is it a tidal effect? State why, making contact with in-class definitions of locally inertial frames and tidal effects. (full sentences)

Rewrite
(Full sentences) Present the Tornado ride and curvature measurement of Greene's paragraphs 2 -- 7 quantitatively, incorporating and explaining your results from Analysis questions 1 -- 3 above. Assume your reader is an undergraduate physics major, with background similar to your own on entering this course. Thus you will need to minimally explain, in general, 1) Lorentz boosts and how they affect spacetime measurements; and 2) circles and curvature defined on curved surfaces, before you use these ideas in your specific analysis of the Tornado problem. Your writing should be fully self-contained, a passage of comparable length to the original passage (that is, you need detail only at the level of Analysis questions 1 -- 3, plus whatever exposition you need to clearly introduce and explain them.)

About this document ...

This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2K.1beta (1.47)

Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, Nikos Drakos, Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999, Ross Moore, Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.

The command line arguments were:
latex2html -split 0 writ2

The translation was initiated by on 2004-04-06


up previous
2004-04-06