Lecture 25
We continued analysis begun last time connecting the expansion (rising
) of the universe and the cooling (falling
) of its particle
populations, in a radiation-dominated universe. We recalled that the
primary constituent, the thermal bath of relativistic particles,
remains in equilibrium as the universe expands, at a temperature
. This is the temperature of all coupled
particles in the universe, relativistic and (because they equilibrate
with the dominant relativistic component) nonrelativistic as well.
We then examined the behavior of particles that decouple from the thermal plasma.
We considered first the case where a particle species decouples while
relativistic -- as occurs both for neutrinos and for
photons. Separate conservation of the species' entropy requires that
, while the particle momenta redshift with the
expansion of the universe. We showed that this implies that the
decoupled particle remains in an equilibrium momentum distribution,
with redshifting temperature
. For most of the time,
while
remains constant, the decoupled particle has a temperature
which is redshifting exactly parallel to that of the
radiation-dominated thermal bath in the universe.
We discussed the one exception to this parallel track: when a particle in thermal contact with the bath becomes nonrelativistic, transferring its entropy to the bath. We calculated how the temperature of the bath is increased by this transfer, over what it would have been had it simply continued redshifting. Since the decoupled species do simply continue redshifting (they cannot interact to participate in this transfer), this raises the temperature of the universe above that of the decoupled species. We calculated the difference between the neutrino and photon temperatures due to this effect. Here the neutrinos decouple from the electron/positron/photon plasma before the electrons and positrons become nonrelativistic, reheating the photons above the neutrino temperature.
We considered next the case where a particle species decouples while
nonrelativistic. Here we had to work harder to retain the leading
nontrivial consequences of
, and eventually obtained that
. There was a memory glitch here, so I will recast next
time. To preview, though, the second law of thermodynamics applied to
a comoving volume says that
. This
was actually used in deriving our expression for the entropy,
. However that derivation, which we skipped, is slightly
nontrivial, it involves satisfying an integrability condition equating
mixed partial derivatives of the entropy, which relates small changes
to
. So, in setting
, it's easiest to go back as a
starting point to the second law of thermodynamics, which states that
when
. Imposing this relates
and
, with solution
. Using the particle's redshift
(
), we showed again that the particle
species remains in an equilibrium distribution, here with redshifting
temperature
. This placed a constraint on the
evolution of
, which is enforced by the species' particle number
conservation.
Note that in the final case, where a particle species
decouples at
, our three facts -- number and entropy
conservation and redshifting particle momenta -- do not lead to a
continued equilibrium distribution for the decoupled species.
We will consolidate these general principles in the standard big bang
cosmology's ``thermal history of the universe,'' beginning at
in a radiation-dominated universe, next
time.
--
KB
This document was generated using the LaTeX2HTML translator Version 2K.1beta (1.47)
Copyright © 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996,
Nikos Drakos,
Computer Based Learning Unit, University of Leeds.
Copyright © 1997, 1998, 1999,
Ross Moore,
Mathematics Department, Macquarie University, Sydney.
The command line arguments were:
latex2html -split 0 25
The translation was initiated by on 2004-04-15