next up previous
Next: About this document

Lecture 17.

Office hours *for next week only* will be Monday after class.

Today we discussed symmetries and conservation laws in quantum mechanics; introduced the Heisenberg picture and the classical limit; and began an analysis of the quantum simple harmonic oscillator.

From here on, iff = if and only if.

As in classical mechanics, a transformation is a symmetry iff the transformed system obeys the same equations of motion as the original system. In the Schrodinger picture, then, U is a symmetry iff U tex2html_wrap_inline33 obeys the Schrodinger equation. We showed that this occurs iff U commutes with the Hamiltonian H.

We then showed that U commutes with H iff its generating charge Q commutes with H. We did this by taking the derivative with respect to the transformation distance a of tex2html_wrap_inline49 , which vanishes iff U commutes with H for all a. We found that the derivative vanishes iff Q commutes with H.

To consider conservation of the charge operator Q, we introduced the Heisenberg picture. We have previously studied Schrodinger's version of quantum mechanics, in which physical states evolve, tex2html_wrap_inline63 (with U(t) the time evolution operator tex2html_wrap_inline67 determined by Schrodinger's equation); and in which operators and their eigenstates remain constant in time. We noted that this theory makes only three kinds of physical predictions: 1) that the inner product of physical states tex2html_wrap_inline69 is constant in time; 2) that expectation values vary in time as tex2html_wrap_inline71 ; and 3) that probability amplitudes for measuring A to be the eigenvalue tex2html_wrap_inline75 vary in time (since operator eigenstates stay constant) as tex2html_wrap_inline77 .

We noted that these three physical predictions had an alternative explanation. We could assume that, as time evolves, the physical states tex2html_wrap_inline79 remain constant, while the operators evolve according to tex2html_wrap_inline81 (which implies that their eigenstates evolve as tex2html_wrap_inline83 ). These assumptions -- called the Heisenberg picture -- reproduce the same 3 physical predictions above, and so give a physically indistinguishable version of quantum mechanics.

We derived the Heisenberg equation of motion, a differential equation for the time dependence of operators in the Heisenberg picture. This told us that if the operator A has no explicit time-dependence, its time derivative is given by tex2html_wrap_inline87 times the commutator tex2html_wrap_inline89 . Thus operators are constant if and only if they commute with the Hamiltonian. Combining this result with our discussion of symmetries above gives the quantum mechanical version of Noether's theorem: every Hermitian charge operator that commutes with the Hamiltonian is conserved, and generates a symmetry transformation tex2html_wrap_inline91 .

We then showed how identities you will prove in homework imply that Heisenberg's equation of motion, when applied to position and momentum operators, produce an operator version of Hamilton's equations. We thus know that, in the classical limit where tex2html_wrap_inline93 goes to zero and operators give their expectation values, we will always recover classical mechanics.

Finally, we began discussion of the quantum simple harmonic oscillator. We noted that the classical Hamiltonian, when promoted into an operator, is second order. A frequent approach with second order differential operators is to factor them into first order operators, to make solving the eigenvalue problem easier. We attempted a naive factorization into the (non-Hermitian) factors tex2html_wrap_inline95 and tex2html_wrap_inline97 . We found that noncommutation of tex2html_wrap_inline99 and tex2html_wrap_inline101 in the cross-terms spoils the exact factorization, giving us a Hamiltonian proportional to the sum tex2html_wrap_inline103 .

-- KB




next up previous
Next: About this document

Katherine Benson
Mon Mar 11 15:31:58 EST 1996