MORALITY,
RELIGION, AND THE LAW
New
Woodruff law professor
grapples with tough questions
Should
our political leaders rely on a religion-based morality to make
decisions that affect American citizens?
Thats
just one of the loaded questions Emory law students can expect
to explore in classes with Michael J. Perry, the new Robert
W. Woodruff Professor of Law. Perry comes to Emory this fall
from Wake Forest University, where he holds the University Distinguished
Chair in Law.
Perry
is nationally known for his work on the relationship between
morality and the law. For the last twenty years, Michael
Perry has been one of the nations leading constitutional
law scholars, says Thomas C. Arthur, dean of Emory School
of law. No contemporary scholar in his field has probed
more deeply the issues of law and morality, or the dilemmas
presented by using moral values to interpret the individual
rights provisions of the Constitution.
With
his keen interest in religion, morality, politics, and human
rights, Perry is expected to bring a new element of synergy
to Emorys law program, which has long sought to strengthen
ties with other areas of the University that deal with morality
and ethics.
He
is quintessentially interdisciplinary, says John Witte
Jr., Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law and Ethics, who chaired
the Woodruff selection committee. He has brought legal,
political, social, and moral theory into a rare and powerful
combination.
In
his nine books, Perry has grappled with some of the oldest and
hardest questions facing American law. He first drew national
attention with his 1982 book The Constitution, the Courts
and Human Rights: An Inquiry Into the Legitimacy of Constitutional
Policymaking by the Judiciary, a defense of judicial activism
which was used by critics of President Ronald Reagans
controversial and ultimately failed nomination of Judge Robert
Bork to the U.S. Supreme Court. His forthcoming book, Under
God? Religious Faith and Liberal Democracy takes up the
question of religious morality and political leadership.
I
argue that nothing in our constitution, in our national political
morality, makes it illegitimate for politicians to rely on religious
morality when they engage in politics, Perry says. However,
I caution that there are reasons internal to religious traditions
for being wary about the extent to which one relies on religious
morality.
Perry
uses fiery issues such as abortion and same-sex marriage in
his assertion that conservative Christians must be cautious
in their use of scripture-based arguments, if those reasons
are not supported by contemporary human experience.
We
have to go back and ask if we have not misinterpreted scripture,
much the way slaveholders did, Perry says. The idea
of human rights is based on the idea that each and every human
being is infinitely precious. But its difficult to defend
that claim apart from religious faith. There is a very solid
foundation for belief in human rights in religious tradition.
Perry
will become the law schools second Woodruff professor.
He will teach courses in law and morality, and the constitution
and human rights. The law schools first Woodruff professor
is comparative and international legal scholar Harold J. Berman,
who came to Emory in 1985 from Harvard Law School; a third,
Martha Fineman, joins the faculty in spring 2004 (see
related story).
The
issues that are of the greatest interest and concern to methe
relation between law and religion and to human rights studiesare
subjects that Emory law school and the University as a whole
are tangibly committed to pursuing, Perry says. There
is no law school or university in the United States that would
be more supportive of my work in these areasor, by virtue
of the overall intellectual and scholarly environment, more
stimulating to methan Emory. I am especially eager to
work with the students who come to Emory in part because of
its institutional commitment to these ideas.P.P.P.
|