| In one window on 
              the computer screen was a video transmission from a journalism class 
              at the Modern Sciences and Art University in Cairo, Egypt, led by 
              Professor Ahmed El Gody. In another, smaller window were images 
              of students from a freshman seminar, “News Media and International 
              Crisis,” led by Professor Shelia Tefft, director of Emory 
              College’s journalism program. 
 The students, 14 in Cairo and 15 at Emory, listened to questions 
              and responded both verbally and by typing their comments into a 
              computer.
 
 Richard Lorenc, a first-year Emory student studying political science 
              and Chinese, asked about Jihad: “Two prevalent definitions 
              are ‘armed struggle’ or ‘holy war,’” 
              Lorenc said. “What would you say your definition is...?”
 
 “There is no such thing as ‘holy war,’” 
              answered Arwa Sallam, an 18-year-old advertising and public relations 
              major born in Saudi Arabia. “Basically what we are trying 
              to do is defend...” She looked at the other students as they 
              talked among themselves about what she should say, smiled, and began 
              again. “We are basically against bloodshed, and we are trying 
              to defend our image. Jihad basically means that we are protecting 
              ourselves against those who oppress us. We are completely against 
              violence and war.”
 
 The videoconference, which took place Nov. 12 at Emory’s Center 
              for Interactive Teaching (ECIT), was set up using Microsoft NetMeeting 
              and Messenger, and it is an example of the kind of technology available 
              for University courses.
 
 All videoconferencing is dependent on having equivalent technology 
              at each transmission site, so it’s necessary for scholars 
              and researchers to have access to a wide range of videoconferencing 
              technologies. For the highest quality video broadcasts for both 
              educational and research needs, ECIT offers three types of live 
              audio/video broadcasting systems: a CUSeeMe person-to-person conferencing 
              system and a Sun Microsystems ShowMe TV multimedia player (both 
              Internet-based), and PictureTel’s Swift Site, which transmits 
              via ISDN phone lines.
 
 Using the ISDN-based system involves minimal costs; there are no 
              added costs when connecting via one of the Internet-based systems. 
              However, these systems depend on the availability of a robust and 
              reliable network.
 
 Emory has access to Internet2 (I2) technology, which greatly increases 
              broadcast quality, speed and reliability on the Internet. Today 
              Emory’s network automatically relays transmissions via I2 
              whenever delivery is to an I2 site, such as those at more than 200 
              U.S. universities, 40 international organizations and networks, 
              and government and corporate I2 partners.
 
 Included in Microsoft Windows 2000, NetMeeting also can be downloaded 
              from Microsoft at no cost. It provides desktop-based videoconferencing, 
              file transfer, chat and application sharing over the Internet, and 
              these options are dependent on users having only a PC with a camera 
              (which usually cost less than $100), microphone and an Internet 
              connection with IP number for each site.
 
 At the lower end of the broadcast-quality spectrum, NetMeeting is 
              best suited to individual videoconferencing but does present an 
              option for videoconferencing with sites with limited technical resources. 
              Tefft recommended having technical support when using this technology.
 
 “When communicating with people who have different views or 
              beliefs than my own, I feel a sense of challenge,” Lorenc 
              said after the conference. “There is the challenge of communicating 
              your ideas across to the other person or group clearly, but there 
              also is the challenge of understanding and absorbing their argument 
              or rationale.”
 
 “I don’t think there was any student who did not come 
              away with some strong feelings, probably covering the whole gamut 
              of reactions,” Tefft said. “Whether we like it or not, 
              we are part of the world—Sept. 11 made sure of that. Backing 
              out and saying that we are not going to communicate with people 
              is not an option, really.
 
 “That’s why I said to [the students] that being angry 
              and reacting to what was said is the first stage of communication,” 
              she continued. “Then you have to move on to other stages and 
              try to communicate at a more sophisticated level—get past 
              that initial gut reaction. I think all of them now are contemplating 
              what those other stages of communication would be. That’s 
              what I’m trying to get them to do.
 
 “It was a great teaching moment for me,” she said.
 
 For more information on videoconferencing options, call ECIT's Wayne 
              Morse at
 404-727-6708.
 |