We are, for better or worse, somewhat addicted to wars of this kind.
In Teddy Roosevelt’s day, a time of general peace, the Marines
were repeatedly sent to invade small Caribbean countries. People
then talked darkly about American empire.—Fraser
Harbutt, history
Failure to claify objectives makes for fuzzy foreign policy. It
means that we as Americans are asked to sacrifice our resources
and our lives for goals that are unclear. We know that countries
that rely heavily on oil exports tend not to be democratic. If we
want to promote democracy, we should encourage these countries to
reduce their reliance on oil. But by refusing to push for energy-saving
measures at home, the administration is signaling that it intends
for the Middle East to continue as a U.S. gas station.—Rick
Doner, political science
Preventive war is a bad policy solution to the problem of nuclear
proliferation. The danger that nuclear weapons could be used aggressively
has been exaggerated. [They] did not help the United States win
in Vietnam; they did not help France keep its Algerian colony. The
destabilizing threat of nuclear weapons is reduced even further
if America commits itself to a deterrence policy of retaliation
against the use of nuclear weapons by rogue states. America has
a long history of deterring nuclear-armed dictators from launching
aggressive moves.—Dan
Reiter, political science
Emory is no doubt a place of brilliance and innovation, but face-to-face
dialogue has subsided to electronic activism—a community relying
on information technology instead of real and audible voices to
discuss and exchange. On our campus, dialogue is replaced with polarization
and intended controversy.—Meg
Rithmire, Foreign Policy Exchange
I’ve seen the capacity of humans to live in absurdly unsafe
conditions and to survive them through the loving intimacy of everyday
routines. But it is the way that their very survival ups the notch
on the acceptability of violence that I find unacceptable.—Maysoun
Freij, anthropology
The traditions of Christianity and Buddhism say we should reflect
on feelings of inadequacy. We should use the motivation of hope
for action—let your inadequacy and guilt go.—Bobbi
Patterson, religion
[Saddam] Hussein burns with a white-hot hatred of this country,
a hatred equal to or greater than that Al-Qaeda has for us. Given
the opportunity, Hussein would gladly wound or destroy us by any
means, and he has surely learned from Al-Qaeda the efficacy of terrorism,
of sneak attacks, in hurting us.—Bob
Bartlett, political science
Villagers are using their cell phones and satellite phones to trade
their gasoline for water. Surely we cannot let technology prevail
so that cell phones and gasoline are more prevalent than clean water
to drink.—Laurie
Patton, religion
The children of Iraq are 100 percent dependent on government food
ration systems. The inevitable disruption of this rationing system
will have devastating effects on the already critical nutritional
status of these children. In fact, the United Nations estimates
that more than 1 million children will die as a result of malnutrition
directly caused by this war.—Aimee
Webb, nutrition & health sciences
The president’s vision is profound and noble: To liberate
the people of Iraq and remove from power Saddam Hussein and his
regime of terror. To the many who oppose the war, the opposition
to this statement is varied, but the intent—delay, diversion
and moral obfuscation—is the same.—Daniel
Hauck, College Republicans
The [U.S.] Army is a force of volunteers tempered by kindness and
respect. The removal of the Hussein regime in Iraq will re-establish
a healthy international respect for the American military power
and presence. We allowed this to rot in the 1990s and have paid
a dear price for it.—Edward
Thayer, College Republicans
The reasons for anti-American sentiment in the Arab world are complex.
They range from the preference of many of the region’s governments
and opposition groups to externalize blame for the region’s
problems rather than search for their roots in local politics and
culture to longstanding grievances concerning the ends and means
of U.S. policy in the Middle East. While many in the Arab world
recognize Saddam Hussein for what he is—an aggressive and
duplicitous tyrant—they reject what they see as the unilateral,
heavy-handed intervention of the world’s only superpower to
expel him.—Carrie
Wickham, political science
In Afghanistan, they tell a story of rainbows and freedom, and that
any girl who walks under a rainbow becomes a boy and any boy becomes
a girl. Perhaps if we switch sides, we’d be better able to
understand each other. And, like the rainbow proclaiming a new morning
after the rains, peace would finally brighten our earth.—Lili
Baxter, women's studies
An airtight patriotism often leads us to believe many things about
ourselves that simply are not so. Our identity is rooted in our
history, and that is precisely the problem. We are products of a
history often reflected by a selective amnesia that discourages
self-critique. That begins with the story of the so-called ‘discovery’
of this land, which we actually took by force from someone else.
[How have] we suddenly become so concerned about the oppressed halfway
around the world when we ignore the downtrodden right here at home?—Nathan
McCall, journalism & African American studies
Without war, we would not have been able to stop slavery. Without
war, we would not have been able to stop the development of fascism
and communism. Without war, we would have been unable to turn back
the invasion of Kuwait. The moral application of war is that we
have been able to move the world out of barbarism and into civility,
creating respect for civil liberties.—James
Tarter, Students for War Against Terrorism
As the future of America, we must start taking an interest in our
government’s policies and actions. Their decisions are our
consequences. It’s time to react to what the leaders of our
country do and say. We are here, we are listening and we will not
stand silently. Advocating peace is as justified as supporting war.
Burning the flag is as patriotic as flying it in pride. Don’t
waste your time arguing over the semantics of patriotism, fighting
over what’s American and what’s not—it’s
irrelevant. Instead, channel your energy into educating yourself.—Erin
Harte, Young Democrats
What unites each enduring form of conflict resolution is the desire
to repair the rip in the social fabric, to return to the state in
which social relations can continue as they were before. In light
of this, the current invasion of Iraq by U.S. and British forces
will not resolve the current conflict, nor will it ensure the type
of national security currently given as a rationale.—Mark
Goodale, anthropology
I served in the United States Army from 1966 to 1968 during the
height of the Vietnam War. I wonder how many of those who favor
the war would favor the return of the draft. Even though I received
several police escorts out of restaurants in Augusta, Ga., and Duncanville,
Texas, during my term of duty, while in uniform, I served and served
honorably. But I was against that war, just like I am against the
war in Iraq. The administration has created a climate of divisiveness
based on false patriotism currently led by the mindset of arrogant
self-rightousness, a mindset that has divided our nation into two
camps, the “patriotic” camp—those who are for
the war and the president—and the “unpatriotic”
camp— those of us who oppose the president and the war. It
is a false dichotomy.—Tariq
Shakoor, Career Services
War creates a “quagmire,” a “humanitarian disaster”
and “blowback,” say worried opponents. With all due
respect, we’ve heard that before. Such expectations were wrong
in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan, and they are likely wrong yet
again—unless Saddam cuts off the water and commits still more
war crimes and crimes against humanity.—Frank
Lechner, sociology
Would our perspectives and decisions be different if we lived closer
to the Middle East? If we could hear the sirens screaming in our
ears day and night? If we could feel the earth shaking below our
bellies on the ground? If we could smell the smoke burning in our
nostrils? If we could see nothing but sand swirling before our eyes?—Juana
Clem McGhee, ICIS
We have consistently failed to show diplomatic savvy and finesse
and have succeeded in appearing inept and tyrannical—a bad
combination. It is a shame that our leading spokesman, President
[George W.] Bush, seems horribly inadequate, mediocre in every conceivable
way except wealth and privilege. We seem to have a knack for offending
our allies. You might object that the French are always getting
offended, but what about everyone else? It’s a shame that
while our generals boast of high-precision bombs that can pinpoint
one window on an airplane, some of these same bombs missed the entire
country of Iraq and landed in Iran. Whoops.—Devin
Stewart, Middle Eastern studies
We remind ourselves where we are—at a university, a special
place reserved for thinking. Hence I encourage you—all of
you, no matter what you believe with respect to the invasion of
Iraq—to think, as hard as you have ever thought about anything,
about the world as it has changed in the last six days. If you are
a champion of this war, do not be afraid to consider other ways
its objectives could have been pursued. War must always be the very
last resort in human life. If you oppose this war, do not be afraid
to consider what the last century revealed: that the dread odor
of true evil can rise from the earth, that terrible tyrannies do
exist, and that courage must at times come forward to suppress them.—Bill
Chace, president
—Compiled
by Eric Rangus; all photos by Ann Borden of University Photography
|